News editor Candace Pontoni is the primary author of this article, I merely contributed.
Published: Tuesday, April 13, 2010 in The Whitworthian as part of a package on how health care reform will affect student life.
Reactions on Whitworth’s campus to President Obama’s recently approved health care reform bill are mixed. Students and faculty came down on both sides of the fence when asked about the bill.
On March 23, President Obama signed into action legislation that will, among other things, allow Americans to purchase health care through state-based exchanges.
The vote on Capitol Hill was split nearly even, with 100 percent of Republicans in both the House and the Senate voting against the measure, and most Democrats voting in favor. The measure passed 219-212 in the House.
Aaron Korthuis, political activism club president, said he has heard both sides of the debate supported by Whitworth students, but that overall he has heard more negative than positive comments about the reform.
“People are less favorable than favorable. There are a lot of people who would have rather seen it passed another way,” Korthuis said.
Andrew Hogue, assistant professor of political science, said he is hearing far more questions than comments.
“There has been a lot of misunderstanding about the bill,” Hogue said. “Even the people who drafted the key components of the bill, and certainly most everyone who voted for it, are unlikely to have read the whole thing.”
Mike Ediger, department of health sciences chair, said he believes some students feel the reform won’t affect them.
“Access to health care is a big issue, but students don’t realize it because they’re on their parents’ health plan,” he said.
Whitworth graduates who aren’t able to afford health insurance have come to Ediger asking for health advice, he said.
“A lot of them are skipping necessary medical procedures because they aren’t able to afford health plans,” Ediger said. “Many aren’t getting health screenings, are skipping their allergy shots, and they are more inclined to have a tooth pulled instead of having the problem with the tooth fixed.”
The new plan will help by giving young adults the option of remaining on their parent’s insurance for a longer period of time.
One stipulation of the bill will allow young adults to remain on their parents’ insurance until they are 26, regardless of whether they are enrolled at a university.
“If you are attending college and want to take a year off of school, right now you wouldn’t be covered by your parent’s insurance during your time off,” said Glen Stream, a doctor at Rockwood Clinic.
As most of the new legislation will not become effective until 2014, however, it’s likely that current students won’t be affected by the reform during their time at Whitworth, Hogue said.
Hogue said many people seem under the impression that they won’t be able to keep their current insurance plans. This, he said, is the most misunderstood part of the new legislation.
“To quote the President, ‘If you like your insurance you can keep it,’” Hogue said.
Another misconception, Hogue said, is that the bill is socialized medical reform. It isn’t correct to classify it this way, Hogue said, as the government won’t be playing the role of an insurance company and providing the same coverage for everyone.
It should instead be considered a system in which the government subsidizes insurance for some, he said.
Like Hogue, Ediger said he doesn’t feel the reform will socialize the health care system.
“I don’t think we’re heading in that direction,” Ediger said. “This may open the door to go there, but I don’t think it will. Making health care available to all is good.”
Stream said allegations that quality of health care will deteriorate under the reform are not grounded, as the bill affects the insurance side of the health care system.
Those who choose to purchase insurance through state-based exchanges should still be able to obtain high-cost procedures such as organ transplants and dialysis, he said.
Some do have concerns about the legislation, however.
Ediger believes greater government presence in the system could result in confusion as to who should dictate the type of care each individual should receive. He feels it is possible that legislative oversight may be brought into health care.
“When we give our government more control of health care, it makes me nervous,” Ediger said. “Health care providers, not congressional committees, should determine quality of health care.”
It’s important that Americans continue to question who is dictating the care they receive as the reform is implemented, he said.
A concern held by Ediger, Stream and Korthuis is that there will not be enough medical health professionals to go around if all Americans who are currently uninsured take advantage of the chance to obtain insurance.
“If all of those who are now uninsured make medical appointments once they are insured, there won’t be enough medical practitioners to care for all of them,” Stream said.
Korthuis likewise feels that the reform has the potential to lower the quality of medical care received by Americans due to increased demand for health care, though the bill contains many provisions that seek to ensure health care quality, he said.
“I think it’s going to depend on the way the medical community responds,” Korthuis said.
Ediger said he feels this problem will likely be addressed through physician assistants and nurse practitioners.
“I believe they will be leaders in primary health care over the next 20 years,” Ediger said.
Hogue said he hopes people are able to get behind the bill.
“I’m hopeful, but not optimistic, that people can come on board and hope for the best with this bill, whether they supported it or not, since it is now the law of the land,” Hogue said.
Stream is looking further down the road.
“I hope we can move quickly beyond the political fallout,” he said. “My hope is that we use this imperfect piece of legislation as a starting point to build a new health care system.”